Maslova v. Kyrgyzstan
Promusicae v. Telefónica de España SAU, Case C‑275/06
Pro bono defence for journalists: two legal defence centres fighting for press freedom in Italy
Pro bono defence for journalists: two legal defence centres fighting for press freedom in Italy Ossigeno per l’Informazione and the Italian Coalition for Civil Liberties…
Prosecutor General v. TV-Radio Company S-2 (Channel “September”)
Constitutional review of article 421-2-5-2 of the French Criminal Code
Saure v. Germany (No. 2)
The Case of Mrs. B
Eon v. France
Though the judgment of the majority in the present matter does expand expression on merits, the extent to which it does so could have been enlarged had the reasons offered by Judge Power-Forde’s in her partly Dissenting Opinion – on the applicant’s entitlement to more than a mere moral victory due to the anxiety suffered by him on being convicted for exercising his freedom of expression and on the need for the affirmation of the principles established in Colombani and Others v. France [ECHR] (2002) 51279/99 – formed part of the reasoning and decision put forth by the majority.