Chapter One Foundation v. Zambian Information and Communications Technology Authority
Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights v. Minister of State, National Security
Eon v. France
Though the judgment of the majority in the present matter does expand expression on merits, the extent to which it does so could have been enlarged had the reasons offered by Judge Power-Forde’s in her partly Dissenting Opinion – on the applicant’s entitlement to more than a mere moral victory due to the anxiety suffered by him on being convicted for exercising his freedom of expression and on the need for the affirmation of the principles established in Colombani and Others v. France [ECHR] (2002) 51279/99 – formed part of the reasoning and decision put forth by the majority.
Feltri v. Albertini
Cultural Control: Censorship and Suppression of the Arts in Poland
Artistic Freedom Initiative (AFI) has released the Artistic Freedom Monitor report on Poland – Cultural Control: Censorship and Suppression of the Arts in Poland The…
Systematic Suppression: Hungary’s Arts and Culture in Crisis
Artistic Freedom Initiative (AFI) has released the Artistic Freedom Monitor report on Hungary – Systematic Suppression: Hungary’s Arts and Culture in Crisis. The report was…
Procedural Rights as Safeguard for Human Rights in Platform Regulation
Published in Policy & Internet, 2022 Abstract: In what way can coregulation and regulation (like that included in the NetzDG and envisaged by the Digital…