Fahrenheit 5651: The Scorching Effect of Censorship
Fahrenheit 5651: The Scorching Effect of Censorship EngelliWeb 2020 Analysis Report on blocked websites and blocked and removed news articles, social media accounts and social…
LEXOTA—A New Tool to Track Government Responses to Online Disinformation Across Sub-Saharan Africa
Global Partners Digital (GPD), the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria (CHR), Article 19 West Africa, the Collaboration on International ICT Policy…
An interview with Agnès Callamard: The way forward
This interview was conducted by Sara Whyatt for IFEX on 11 November 2016. The interview was originally published on IFEX.org. Sara Whyatt: You have had…
In re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation
CG v. Facebook Ireland Ltd
The State v. Cassandra Vera
CGFoE’s 10th Anniversary, Keynote Speech by Dr. Hawley Johnson
Keynote Address by Dr. Hawley Johnson at CGFoE’s 10th Anniversary Celebration April 25, 2024 Italian Academy, Columbia University, New York City Watch Dr. Hawley Johnson…
Google Inc. v. AEPD
This decision widens the scope of freedom of expression by considering that blocking or filtering internet search results by name is less acceptable in cases where the contested information refers to professional life of an individual and is in the public interest. When balancing freedom of expression against the right to be forgotten, the Court gave prevalence to the former by highlighting the fact that web users and potential patients have a right to access information in a free manner about persons of public interest in the private sector. Right to access information thus, gives way to the right to be forgotten when dissemination of such information is in the public interest.