Access to Public Information, National Security, Political Expression
Abdullah Al-Hadidi (U.A.E. Twitter Case)
United Arab Emirates
Nominations Are Now Open for the 2024 Columbia Global Freedom of Expression Prizes. Learn more and nominate here.
Closed Expands Expression
Global Freedom of Expression is an academic initiative and therefore, we encourage you to share and republish excerpts of our content so long as they are not used for commercial purposes and you respect the following policy:
Attribution, copyright, and license information for media used by Global Freedom of Expression is available on our Credits page.
The Superior Chamber of the Federal Electoral Tribunal held that the right to receive information about the organization, work, financial resources and statutes of political parties is an element of the right to information, which, in turn, is a basis for the free exercise of other fundamental rights. Accordingly the Tribunal found that authorities have to guarantee access to the financial information of political parties, including the party leaders’ monthly salaries and other benefits.
This case analysis was contributed by Right2Info.org.
Jorge Arturo Zárate, a reporter, asked the Federal Electoral Institute (Institute) to provide information about: 1) the monthly salaries or income received by the chairmen or national leaders of all political parties, 2) monthly salaries of the members of their national executive committees or their national leadership commissions and 3) other work-related benefits.
The Institute denied the request on the ground that it did not hold such information. After the Commission for Transparency and Access to Information of the Federal Electoral Institute upheld the Institute’s decision, Zárate appealed to the Federal Electoral Tribunal.
The Tribunal recognized that access to information is a basis for the exercise of other fundamental rights. A citizen is unable to exercise his rights enshrined in the Mexican Constitution, in particular, the right to free and democratic participation in society and in the life of the state, if he or she does not receive timely access to complete up-to-date information.
One of the purposes of the Federal Transparency and Access to Public Government Information Law (RTI Law) is to ensure that society has a real possibility to monitor government activities. Given that political parties are the political associations of citizens and receive considerable public funding, they should also be subject to public scrutiny.
Relying on Article 19(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 13(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, the Court held that all Mexican citizens have a right to receive information about the organization, work, financial resources and statutes of political parties .
Even though political parties are not expressly listed as a subject of the RTI Law (Article 3), the Federal Electoral Institute in fact collects and stores information regarding their organization and financial data. The procedure for collecting information is laid down in the guidelines approved by the General Council of the Federal Electoral Institute. Thus the Federal Electoral Institute was able to meet the applicant’s request, especially given the fact that the requested information was not confidential.
Decision Direction indicates whether the decision expands or contracts expression based on an analysis of the case.
The decision expands expression by finding that the public has a right to receive accurate and up-to-date information to enable citizens to participate in a democratic society and in particular to monitor government activities.
Global Perspective demonstrates how the court’s decision was influenced by standards from one or many regions.
Case significance refers to how influential the case is and how its significance changes over time.
Let us know if you notice errors or if the case analysis needs revision.