Global Freedom of Expression

Español العربية

Almaty Mayor’s Office v Havas Media Worldwide

Closed Contracts Expression

Key Details

  • Mode of Expression
    Pamphlets / Posters / Banners
  • Date of Decision
    October 28, 2014
  • Outcome
    Monetary Damages / Fines
  • Case Number
    N/A
  • Region & Country
    Kazakhstan, Europe and Central Asia
  • Judicial Body
    First Instance Court
  • Type of Law
    Administrative Law
  • Themes
    Commercial Speech, Indecency / Obscenity

Content Attribution Policy

Global Freedom of Expression is an academic initiative and therefore, we encourage you to share and republish excerpts of our content so long as they are not used for commercial purposes and you respect the following policy:

  • Attribute Columbia Global Freedom of Expression as the source.
  • Link to the original URL of the specific case analysis, publication, update, blog or landing page of the down loadable content you are referencing.

Attribution, copyright, and license information for media used by Global Freedom of Expression is available on our Credits page.

Case Analysis

Case Summary and Outcome

Havas Worldwide Kazakhstan, an advertisement agency in Kazakhstan, created a poster for an international advertising competition. The poster portrayed two male Kazakh cultural figures kissing.

The mayor’s office and a conservatory named after one of the cultural figures sued Havas Wordwide for unethical advertising. The court ruled in the plaintiffs’ favor and awarded over $180,000 in damages.


Facts

Havas Worldvide Kazakhstan is an advertisement agency based in Kazakhstan. The agency designed a poster for an international advertisement competition. The poster was of Pushkin, a Russian poet, and Kurmangazy, a Kazakh musician, kissing; the men are considered cultural icons in Kazakhstan.

The poster was not published by the agency, but it began to draw attention after a copy was posted on Facebook on August 24 on a page of an LGBT nightclub in Almaty, the capital of Kazakhstan. Within a month, a class action suit had been filed, along with a suit by the Almaty mayor’s office, which claimed that the poster violated Article 349(1) of the Kazakh Administrative Code. The specified law bars the creation, distribution and use of advertisements (works and services) that are forbidden by the law in Kazakhstan. In this case, the forbidden subject is the male cultural icons kissing.

On September 24, an Almaty court ruled in favor of the mayor’s office, finding the poster “unethical” and fined Havas $1,700.

On October 4, 2014, the Almaty court heard a separate complaint from the Kurmangazy, one of the cultural icons, conservatory. The conservatory also demanded monetary compensation for moral damages from Havas Wordlwide in the amount of $180,000 for unethical advertising that insulted the name of their school. The court ruled in favor of the conservatory.


Decision Overview

In making its ruling for the mayor’s office, the court relied on a specialist from the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Mayoral office of Almaty. The specialist stated that the poster was unethical, however, neither the court nor the specialist explained what standard of ethics was applied. Moreover, the court refused Havas Worldwide’s motion for a psycho-artistic expert review of the poster to determine whether or not it was unethical.

In making its ruling for the conservatory, the court set a precedent where images of men kissing are enough to cause moral harm.


Decision Direction

Quick Info

Decision Direction indicates whether the decision expands or contracts expression based on an analysis of the case.

Contracts Expression

Kazakhstan is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Thus, it is obliged to respect the right of freedom of expression. Comment 34 of the UN committee on ICCPR clarified that “the mere fact that forms of expression are considered to be insulting to a public figure is not sufficient to justify the imposition of penalties.”

In the case against Havas Worldwide we have a clear violation of the right to freedom of expression by the Kazakh courts.

Global Perspective

Quick Info

Global Perspective demonstrates how the court’s decision was influenced by standards from one or many regions.

Table of Authorities

National standards, law or jurisprudence

  • Kaz., Admin. Code art. 349

Case Significance

Quick Info

Case significance refers to how influential the case is and how its significance changes over time.

The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

The case established a precedent by which two males kissing can be deemed offensive and punishable with a fine.

Official Case Documents

Reports, Analysis, and News Articles:


Have comments?

Let us know if you notice errors or if the case analysis needs revision.

Send Feedback