Content Regulation / Censorship, Defamation / Reputation, National Security, Political Expression, Press Freedom
Le Ministère Public v. Uwimana Nkusi
Rwanda
Closed Mixed Outcome
Global Freedom of Expression is an academic initiative and therefore, we encourage you to share and republish excerpts of our content so long as they are not used for commercial purposes and you respect the following policy:
Attribution, copyright, and license information for media used by Global Freedom of Expression is available on our Credits page.
Mazen Darwish, a Syrian journalist and recipient of UNESCO’s World Press Freedom Prize as well as the winner of the Reporters Without Borders award (2013), was arrested and jailed in February 2012. The charges against him alleged that he had promoted terrorist activities. He was released by the Syrian authorities on August 10, 2015. On August 31, 2015, Darwish was acquitted by a Syrian court.
Mazen Darwish, director of the Syrian Centre for Media and Freedom of Expression, and two colleagues, Hani al-Zitani and Hussein Gharir, were arrested in February 2012. Prior to this, Darwish had been an outspoken critic against President’ Bashar al-Assad’s rule and the crackdown on protests in March 2011. The charges brought against Darwish alleged that he had promoted terrorist acts. Several human rights and freedom of press organizations had petitioned the Syrian government to released Darwish. Finally on August 10, 2015, Syrian authorities released Darwish.
Global FoE could not identify official legal and government records on the case and information on the case was derived from secondary sources. Global FoE notes that media outlets may not provide complete information about this case. Additional information regarding legal matters will be updated as an official source becomes available.
On August 31, 2015, Darwish was acquitted by a Syrian court. Authorities stated that Darwish’s case was part of a presidential pardon.
Global FoE could not identify official legal and government records on the case and information on the case was derived from secondary sources. Global FoE notes that media outlets may not provide complete information about this case. Additional information regarding legal matters will be updated as an official source becomes available.
Decision Direction indicates whether the decision expands or contracts expression based on an analysis of the case.
While this case resulted favorably for the defendant, Marzen Darwish, this decision came out of a presidential pardon and does not expand freedom of expression for others.
Global Perspective demonstrates how the court’s decision was influenced by standards from one or many regions.
Case significance refers to how influential the case is and how its significance changes over time.
This acquittal was connected to a presidential pardon, thus for this specific case Marzen Darwish has been pardoned, however, this does not set any type of precedent for other journalists facing similar circumstances in Syria.
Let us know if you notice errors or if the case analysis needs revision.